In case anybody can't find it, here are the final guidelines. Mostly, it's the same gunk that I've seen for all of these. I don't think they are following the IAEA for a seismo-tectonic visualization (model) of the region. There is no mention of grout. (I guess that's just pouring concrete!).
Mostly, the proponent will pay lip service to all of these points, and the panel will pretend to read them. They mention that the panel will have a staff analyzing this as well, which I find interesting. I wonder who they are?
At least, when OPG is asked about 'alternatives' to Darlington B, they can always point to Bruce C, and vice versa!