Charting the coming ice age.
Sorry!You are not completely forgotten though :-)
I see death. I'm going to the cottage.
No offense, but IMO you don't seem to go out of your way to make your articles "visitor friendly", which is not a good way to encourage repeat visits. I usually see your posts first in the "AllGeo" gadget set up by Chris Rowan ("Highly Allochthonous") rather than directly wandering by here, and a typical posting is a link (entitled just "Article"!) with a brief comment that I could only assume would be pithy or insightful if I knew what the topic of the article was, and/or visited here frequently enough to know what you were referring to. It is asking a lot of a drive-by visitor to follow the link (did I mention: its typically just entitled "Article"?) to figure it all out.Also, I read a lot of your comments about the tunnel, but I can't say I know what the tunnel is actually for (and only in your last post on the topic did the possibility occur to me that its a tunnel to carry water). Maybe if I was a regular here I'd know (but I'm not, so I don't). It would be nice if you did something like embed a link to a prior posting on the tunnel under the first occurrence of the word "tunnel", or something like that.You seem knowledgable and have a rich background (and in general I like your schtick about idiots running the world), but, in short, most of the time I really can't figure out what you talking about, and don't have the patience to click on the generic link to find out if it would be interesting or not.Anyway, like I said: no offense intended.
Yes, I have decided that my great fear of being too clear (for the nasty lawyers) has made me generally useless.
Post a Comment